(Cubase does what pro tools does but you cant master in cubase), just for example.Įvery DAW has its key functions that others dont. ive been in more studios to than metres to the moon and back, so ive used alot of software.
Im gunna be honest with you, no DAW has everything. Hey man, all good about the babble, i get like that don't get many visitors in the rest home my posts always devolve into old war stories Anyone remember Media Vision Pro Audio Spectrum 16? But it was fast on that 486, and the P3 Celeron that replaced it. But what a day when I found SAW for $399.00. I haven't used or even tried them all, but I remember the 16 bit destructive editor that came with Turtle Beach Monterey (whose name escapes me) lots of features, including a time compress that was nasty and took quite a while on a 486/33 to the order of 'let's go to lunch while this works on this 30 second spot'. Mixcraft is good for quick-and-dirty/meatball audio production it gives good results easily without a lot of fuss. Mixcraft seemed to be the easiest for me to jump in and use coming from a less midi/more audio background. There are a lot of good choices in all price ranges.
It's interesting to see the different 'approaches' to DAW.
